Recommended Reading: The Battle For Pakistan

UPDATE 4/20/2010

I spent some time going through New America’s website and realized that in addition to Fishman’s piece, they unleashed a tsunami of brilliant work this week on militancy in Pakistan.

Go here to their main page to view all the articles:  http://counterterrorism.newamerica.net/the_battle_for_pakistan

While all the pieces look strong, I’ll specifically draw your attention to the masterfully crafted article entitled, Al-Qaeda’s Allies, by Anne Stenersen.    Although I’ve never met Anne in person, I’m a huge fan of her work.  She’s at the Norwegian Defence Research Establishment (FFI) and consistently produces top-tier analysis. Between her, Hegghammer, Lia, Nesser, Tonnessen and Rogan, among others, the Norwegians (and don’t forget Stephane Lacroix) have come to dominate the field jihadi-salafi studies.   They have raised the bar for what it means to do good work on jihadi studies to a dauntingly high level.  It’s become the gold standard in my opinion so I encourage you to read their work.  Also, a big kudos to Peter Bergen for orchestrating this symphony of scholarship. What a boon to our community to have this much good analysis on such an opaque world come out at such a critical time.

Here’s video from the joint Foreign Policy and New America unveiling:

_________________________

Brian Fishman over at the New America Foundation just put out a new piece that I highly encourage you to read covering militant groups operating in the NWFP and FATA.

The paper has five sections. The first addresses the cross-cutting background issues that shape militancy in the region. The second analyses the importance of Mullah Omar, the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), al-Qaeda, and drone strikes in the FATA. The third addresses the idioms and concepts used to understand the militant actors in the FATA. The fourth summarizes militancy in each FATA agency and Swat. The fifth is a brief conclusion.

Money quote:

The universe of militants in Pakistan’s Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) and North-West Frontier Province (NWFP) is far more diverse than commonly understood. Although there are important ideological and historical commonalities among the fighters, militant groups have very different backgrounds, tribal affiliations, and strategic concepts.

4 comments

  1. e.l. totsira says:

    Will read the Fishman piece, for sure. A couple of insightful recent monographs of considerable interest in developing a deeper perspective on Pakistani strategic thinking:
    1. Haider A. H. Mullick, Pakistan’s Seuring Paradox: Countering and Fomenting Insurgencies (JSOU Report 09-0, December 2009).
    2. Ryan Clarke, Lashkar-i-Taiba: The Fallacy of Subservient Proxies and the Future of Islamist Terrorism in India (U.S. Army War College, The Letort Papers, Strategic Studies Institute.

    Attended the 21st Annual Strategic Studies Institute Conference in Carlisle April 6-8, 2010 and these were available gratis. I believe they are available gratis, but if not, definitely key to understanding that without a clear understanding of the Pakistan-India question, the meaning of insurgency and terrorism in South Asia can only be partially understood.

  2. e.l. totsira says:

    First title should read: Pakistan’s Security Paradox, not “Seuring” Paradox.

  3. Steve Corman says:

    She also has a new report on profiling the Taliban. Very smart.

    http://www.mil.no/multimedia/archive/00136/00359_136353a.pdf

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please leave these two fields as-is:

Protected by Invisible Defender. Showed 403 to 28,236 bad guys.